the Diagnosis

How can you tell if someone is not telling the truth?

Vagueness.

She wrote that statement while I am hiding from her and dilluting the situation to "stress."

That is curious.

I was married to a career grifter so I understand her tactic. It is a strategy to hide behind plausible deniability, so that later she can say, "What I really meant was..."

Once you see this pattern, you can't help but notice how strange it is for a wife who just filed a Section 302 with MCES just a two hours before she said that.

What she told MCES and told the later patient are two completely different stories.

Plausible deniability has its risk, like why aren't you saying exactly what happened, and has never stated what it was, outside the one time to MCES?

---

I

After Maria Isabel Williams called MCES to start the Section 302 she only contacted me 4 times, with only once making contact on 6/9/23. That means her email statements are the only statments she made.

The data above shows some curious information.

The first is the urgency to contact a husband who was missing for 3 days does not register.

The second is that MCES timestamps calls, so they could confirm the call log data I sent them is real.

The third, and final one, is that all communication with my wife was through email after 6/6/23, with the exception of 6/9 call.

Talking is no longer the terrain for the identity thief, and all her statements are recorded.

As for what my wife told MCES, well that is based on the testimony of the letter from August W Heckman III.

The more you dig into her statements, the more it becomes obvious that she does not behave like a concerned wife. She took a poorly written letter as proof that I was threatening. I am not complaining, but simply explaining.

It should be obvious to some that we are dealing with a scam artist who forced a diagnosis.

---

II

The Section 302 used August W Heckman III's letter where a title is considered a threat.

You couldn't ask for a worse document to apply, since technically it is triple hearsay, like a game of whisper down the lane.

Named Person sees title, "The Obituary Section - Posts Coming Soon, and feels threatned.

Named Person tells August W Heckman III, who write a cease-and-desist letter to me, which was not hand delivered to me, but most likely given to Maria Isabel Williams.

When I got the letter it was opened.

Maria Isabel Williams uses the letter, as the third person who know uses what I wrote, taken out of context, and submits it for MCES to approve.

MCES approves the letter and this is what they approved.

---

III

August W Heckman signed that he finds a title threatening.

And the email statements the MCES Petitioenr, who also happens to be an identity thief, also signed a statement that the email is hers.

I am a stickler for trying to confirm if the person is who she says she is. Luckily the divorce signagurte, alsong with the email she sent it, can serve as proof that this is truly the MCES Petitioner, who's name is Maria Isabel Williams.

That makes all the emails statements she made, reasonable that it is her.

III

All email statements that I show are coming from the highlighted email address below